[CentOS] Why is yum not liked by some?
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.comFri Sep 9 22:22:25 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [CentOS] Why is yum not liked by some?
- Next message: [CentOS] Why is yum not liked by some?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, 2005-09-09 at 16:56, Bryan J. Smith wrote: > I've used revision control systems for binary file management > -- again, in the CAM world as well as EDA. The problem is > the sheer data involved. There are lots of ways to do things wrong. The fact that you have experience with some of them does not mean that it is impossible to get it right. > It's much, much easier to serve > things whole than to "ripple" deltas when dynamically > "re-assembling" a binary -- even if it's just part of it. That is obviously an overgeneralization and incorrect in any number of cases. Change a couple of bytes in an iso image on the other end of a dialup line. Would you rather let rsync find and send the difference or wait for the whole thing? A pre-built rdiff delta could give you that even faster. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com
- Previous message: [CentOS] Why is yum not liked by some?
- Next message: [CentOS] Why is yum not liked by some?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list