[CentOS] Re: Why is yum not liked by some? -- CVS analogy (and why you're not getting it)
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.comSat Sep 10 03:15:24 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [CentOS] Re: Why is yum not liked by some? -- CVS analogy (and why you're not getting it)
- Next message: [CentOS] Re: Why is yum not liked by some? -- CVS analogy (and why you're not getting it)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, 2005-09-09 at 21:28, Roy wrote: > On Fri, 2005-09-09 at 16:58 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > > But poking around I see some xml > > gunk that I didn't expect (hadn't looked closely since it was > > just headers, packages, and header.info). I wonder if the > > installed RPM data gets cached now too. > > Yeah, that xml gunk isn't anything... it's only gives all the info that > yam uses to update something... not too important. > > Maybe you need to maybe look inside? Ya think? Maybe. There was a time when it didn't exist and yum did all the same things without it. I thought there was some philosophical reason for all of those individual .hdr files but maybe that has changed now. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com
- Previous message: [CentOS] Re: Why is yum not liked by some? -- CVS analogy (and why you're not getting it)
- Next message: [CentOS] Re: Why is yum not liked by some? -- CVS analogy (and why you're not getting it)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list