[CentOS] mkfs.ext3 on a 9TB volume
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.comSun Sep 11 18:13:57 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [CentOS] mkfs.ext3 on a 9TB volume
- Next message: [CentOS] mkfs.ext3 on a 9TB volume
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sun, 2005-09-11 at 11:20, Peter Arremann wrote: > All that said, I too would recommend going with Reiser or XFS. I once had a > ext3 filesystem that had one damaged sector in the journal... of course it > fell back to ext2 behavior and the fs check took all weekend :-) I've had exactly the same experience with reiserfs several times and the weird syntax of the the reiserfs version of fsck makes it not work automatically. So not only does it take forever, it waits all weekend for you to come in and type the --rebuild-tree option to the command before even starting. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com
- Previous message: [CentOS] mkfs.ext3 on a 9TB volume
- Next message: [CentOS] mkfs.ext3 on a 9TB volume
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list