[CentOS] mkfs.ext3 on a 9TB volume
Francois Caen
frcaen at gmail.comMon Sep 12 01:41:48 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [CentOS] mkfs.ext3 on a 9TB volume
- Next message: [CentOS] mkfs.ext3 on a 9TB volume
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 9/11/05, Joshua Baker-LePain <jlb17 at duke.edu> wrote: > Having hit a similar issue (big FS, I wanted XFS, but needed to run centos > 4), I just went ahead and stuck with ext3. My FS is 5.5TiB -- a software > RAID0 across 2 3w-9xxx arrays. I had no issues formatting it and have had > no issues in testing or production with it. So, it can be done. Perhaps > the bugs you're hitting are in the FC driver layer? ext3 had a 4TB limit: http://batleth.sapienti-sat.org/projects/FAQs/ext3-faq.html) which I didn't know when I started this thread. I found it the hard way, through testing. There are ways to force past that limit (mkpartfs ext2 in parted, then tune2fs -j), but the resulting filesystem is totally unstable. Joshua, how the heck did you format your 5.5TB in ext3? You 100% sure it's not mounted as ext2? Francois
- Previous message: [CentOS] mkfs.ext3 on a 9TB volume
- Next message: [CentOS] mkfs.ext3 on a 9TB volume
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list