[CentOS] Why is yum not liked by some?
Johnny Hughes
mailing-lists at hughesjr.comWed Sep 14 13:58:39 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [CentOS] Why is yum not liked by some?
- Next message: [CentOS] Why is yum not liked by some?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 06:03 -0700, Bryan J. Smith wrote: > Johnny Hughes <mailing-lists at hughesjr.com> wrote: > > Because of this fact (as Bryan has pointed out), > > I think I'm just going to talk to people off-list and asking > getting people to answer for me. Apparently when it comes > out of my mouth, instead of being a bunch of technical facts > and possible solutions around the pros/cons, it comes out at > "Hey everyone, look how smart I am?!?!?! Come worship me!" > > And in the famous words of Captain James T. Kirk, "We're > busy." > > My comment was not meant to be negative. You were correct to point out that yum: 1. Doesn't look at files 2. Creates metadata that is only accurate when it is run. I was just agreeing with you. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20050914/1cce78f4/attachment-0001.sig>
- Previous message: [CentOS] Why is yum not liked by some?
- Next message: [CentOS] Why is yum not liked by some?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list