[CentOS] Recommendation for HTML editor (a better approach?)
Scot L. Harris
webid at cfl.rr.comWed Sep 21 18:15:59 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [CentOS] Recommendation for HTML editor (a better approach?)
- Next message: [CentOS] Recommendation for HTML editor (a better approach?)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, 2005-09-21 at 13:53, Dave Gutteridge wrote: > > Sorry if this was already suggested, but Quanta plus will do what you > > are asking. > > I'm still considering all the options people are presenting. But I > wondered about Quanta plus in that if it's tied to KDE, won't it require > that I download a billion different KDE packages? And isn't there a CPU > cost in running a KDE program in Gnome? > > Last time I did this, I tried to install Amarok and it seemed to install > KDE and make it my default desktop without me even wanting it to. I > tried working within KDE for a while, just to see how I liked it, and > decided I preferred Gnome. > > So while Quanta looks appealing, is it really feasible to run it in > Gnome? I have not had any problems on my systems here. I prefer gnome as well. Quanta used to be a separate package but now it is part of kdewebdev package. I have two systems here running gnome as the default desk top and I have quanta loaded.
- Previous message: [CentOS] Recommendation for HTML editor (a better approach?)
- Next message: [CentOS] Recommendation for HTML editor (a better approach?)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list