On Mon, 2005-09-12 at 22:30 -0500, cajun wrote: > Thanks for the replies. Sorry to get anything started. People read too much into things all-the-time. I just wanted to make sure you were aware. > I should have been more clear up front. I have been looking at FC > for a while now and I knew that you could upgrade from RHL to FC, with > little or no trouble. > And I also knew that from RHL you can not do an upgrade to > RHEL/CentOS. I was looking at doing a fresh install from scratch even > with FC. From some of the stories I have read, I figured a fresh > install would be easier for me. Although I've had no issues upgrading from Red Hat Linux 7.3 through Fedora Core 3, if you're going to re-install, _definitely_ go CentOS for the lifespan. Fedora Legacy hasn't disappointed me yet, but as Greg pointed out, Red Hat has _only guaranteed updates Red Hat Enterprise Linux -- hence CentOS. -- Bryan J. Smith b.j.smith at ieee.org http://thebs413.blogspot.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- The best things in life are NOT free - which is why life is easiest if you save all the bills until you can share them with the perfect woman