On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 08:58 -0700, Bryan J. Smith wrote: > > Bryan, > > if i was going to be a dick head and go after you for > > posting on here i would.....and you would know it > > too...because i would mention your name.....so get the > > f%^$ off your high horse and everyone is not after > > you.....i think it is time for you to take your pysch > > meds again your getting a little paranoid again!!!!! Here here. > I would just once like someone _else_ to be quoted. And if someone else continually ruins this list by being pompous, I'm sure they will be quoted. > The coincidence between the first complaint and my > self-removal of the thread ... then several days later, I > respond again and another complaint is made, is just getting > old. These self-removals don't last long. > I'm not the only person in these threads. > > But it appears for whatever "consistency" -- my verbage, my > technical detail, my offering of solutions, my requests that > people actually have first-hand experience before pondering > (and refusing to see things another way from those that do), > etc..., etc..., etc... -- I'm _always_ the one quoted (if not > directly accused). > > That's what drives "paranoia." No. Being paranoid drives paranoia. Thus the reference to seeking help from a psychiatrist or listening to him/her if you're already seeking help. > Which is my #1 pet-peeve, hypocrisy. Ummm.... Huh? Preston