Preston Crawford <me at prestoncrawford.com> wrote: > Of course it was. But this isn't the first time the topic > of you "sporting your knowledge" has come up. *WHEN* did I "sport my knowledge" *1* time in this *ENTIRE* thread! God, I think the only things I mentioned were: 1. I always run my own, internal repositories for clients 2. You have to have run your own repositories to understand the limits of YUM, or understand how deltas work to know they don't solve the problem for clients (only mirrors) > And it's not EVERY PERSON on this list that is wrong. And I have _explicitly_ said "Select People" over and over. I have explicitly said I don't care if it's "subscience" or "dilberate," I want it to _stop_ from "Select People." People always assuming things are due to 1 person, even if subsconsicence and not intentional, have a nasty habit of becoming habit. ;-> Furthermore, several _other_ people affirmed #1 and #2 above in addition to myself. So I'm not the only one who said basically the same thing (even if I might have been the first). > Something to think about, at least. If I walked into a room > and annoyed almost every person in the room Now _you_ are saying and asserting "annoyed almost every person!" Stop stating what you want me to have said, not what I actually said! God, are purposely trying to _drive_ the so-called "paranoia." > I wouldn't think they were jerks, out to get me, I would > wonder what I said or how I said what I said. Actually, I'm _not_ the one calling you guys "jerks" or otherwise. I said I'm just tired of what I _see_ of "select people" do on-list that is _only_ directed towards me an _no_one_else_! That's the reality, what you "select people" do! The hypocrisy is in the fact that you, among a handful of others, are psycho-analyzing me, and contributing to the "indirect paranoia" in the first place. Stop and it will end. Continue and you wonder why I want to prevent people from constantly attributing _everything_ to myself and myself only. I've had other, very illegal comments/deeds attributed to myself on other lists because there quickly becomes the default of "oh, that was Bryan Smith, he's always the troublemaker and capable of anything." > Just some helpful advice. Bull, and you know it. The hypocrisy of your agenda in this message and the prior message has _you_ putting things in more "absolutes" than anyone else! Again, re-read your comments on: - "sporting your knowledge" - "If I walked into a room and annoyed almost every person in the room" You are _purposely_ trying to feed it right there! And I'll I'm saying ... "Select people ... dudes! Please stop!" ;-> After that, I'm _still_ saying _only_ select people. And I'm merely saying I'm "tired of the coincidences, even if they are not deliberate and subsonscience." But here's the deal. It's clear that you do not like the fact that I only "temporarily" stop posting. So I'll now make it permanent for the benefit of all you "select people" think it is for. -- Bryan J. Smith | Sent from Yahoo Mail mailto:b.j.smith at ieee.org | (please excuse any http://thebs413.blogspot.com/ | missing headers)