Brian T. Brunner wrote:
> This advice completely misses my point.
I think you missed the point.
>>What I'd like to find is a comparison of gcc 2.96.x to 3.x from the
>>perspective of porting something from RH7.x to CentOS/RHEL 4.x
>
>
> I don't want my code to stay rooted in The Dead Past.
> I want to know what kinds of things changed to give me clues
> how to CHANGE MY CODE TO FIT TODAY.
The C programming language did not change. The most likely reason
your code won't compile is that the compiler is B-R-O-K-E-N.
[snip]
Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!