At 16:47 23/09/05, you wrote: >On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 04:22:45PM +0100, Dr R L Oswald wrote: > > We operate a cluster of Sun Xeon IA32 servers with Centos 3.5. Nodes are >[...] > > > The CENTOS 3.5 ISO images are exported from a server & that remote NFS >[... kickstart with NFS exported x86_64 iso...] > > > > When we install these 64-bit nodes, however, we get the message: "that > > directory could not be mounted from the server". On hitting OK we get > > the usual dialogue box which displays our chosen server IP and the > > correct x86_64 ISO directory, if we OK that, the NFS installation > > proceeds unattended as normal. >I have seen that when the NFS server was too slow to answer the >fast opteron boxes.. YMMV Hi Tru Well NFS server is a Xeon 3GHz DP with 6GB RAM & all connections are GE into the same switch. Its is not actually NFS serving anything else but on-demand Centos installs. One would have hoped that it would cope as it does with the other 3GHz clients. I'll take a look at what limited NFS tuning can be done with the Linux NFS daemon [compared to a genuine Solaris one that is >:-} ] However your theory could explain the variability we saw with RH9 - the NFS server is one of two front ends to a cluster, sometimes students cause a brief heavy load on the server by running compute tasks that they are not meant to & that would impact NFS server response time. Les >Tru >-- >Tru Huynh (CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) >http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B > > >_______________________________________________ >CentOS mailing list >CentOS at centos.org >http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos