Tim Edwards wrote: > > The compat-glibc packages from Centos4 are glibc 2.3.2 not 2.3.3. If > you can successfuly do a rpm -q glibc-compat or rpm -ql glibc-compat > then they're installed. Unfortunately it looks like you need glibc > 2.3.3 :( > You might need to look at compiling glibc-2.3.3 from source or > googling for glibc2.3.3 and trying one of the RPMs for it from another > distro (definately something to try on a test machine first!). > Tim, I believe you hit the nail on the head that time. I'm not positive, but there actually could be a problem with the portland group's compiler. There have been too many instances of folks building this software on a similar platform with only minor problems. I've run into library problems almost since I installed it. I'm about ready to dump the 64 and drop back to the 32-bit version, if for nothing else, compatiblity' sake with some of this software. I took a look at the pgf library with nm, and there is only one instance where it calls the 2.3 version, and does NOT specify 2.3.3, so there may be something in the sources causing problems too, but again, it's been built on similar systems, but most likely with earlier versions of both the compiler and the OS. I'm at the point now till I have just about run out of options, and after looking at a 2.3.3 version rpm, it won't install because of dependencies and I'm just not going that far with this. I've already spent way too much time tracking down problems, and it still is a dead in the water project. I'll give serious thought to building the sources for that lib, only ifI can verify it *has* to have it.. Thanks for your insights... -- Snowman