On Sun, 2006-04-02 at 12:04 -0700, Bogdan Nicolescu wrote: > What is hard to understand is if I take the same EXACT > kernel Centos take, which I assume is available, and I > compile everything Centos compiles in, except I > compile some hardware in the kernel rather than > modularize it (as Centos does), how exactly is that > going to break functionality? How exactly is removing > ext2 (if it is included in Centos default compilation) > from the kernel is going to break Centos if I don't > ever use ext2? > I told you where to get the kernels and how to compile it in a different post ... Look in the SRPMS directory in the os or update trees for the latest update set, or in http://vault.centos.org/ for older versions. Every kernel we have released has it's SRPM there. I also pointed you to the release notes ... search for "kernel source": http://mirror.centos.org/centos/4/docs/html/release-notes/as-x86/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20060402/04f42be6/attachment-0004.sig>