On Sun, 2006-04-30 at 19:13 -0400, José Alburquerque wrote: > albi wrote: > > >erhm, the vsftp-software stands for "very secure ftp", but of course the > >admin and the admin's configuring makes it secure or not > > > >(the fact that the redhat-company now uses it as their default > >ftp-server doesn't mean anything, because they were provided wu-ftpd as > >the default ftp-server install years ago afair, and wu-ftpd has a pretty > >bad reputation as has other software from WU, like pine) > > > May I ask what is wrong with pine? TIA. > It's license -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20060430/05a9ffc2/attachment-0004.sig>