-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 08:52:47PM -0400, Steven wrote: > I agree, I was looking for the source to test whether asterisk PBX worked better with an interruptible kernel. > I also was intending to test reiserfs because of its low CPU usage, but from what I have read on it, It may work better/faster than > other filesystems, but if it breaks, you are pretty much SOL. So, I am not even going there. Reiserfs ... I've heard it is much better now, and it doesn't even break as often as it used to. It now only breaks likes 10x more often than any other filesystem (previously it was like 100x). All (half) jokes aside, if you want to try a new fs type, you might was well go for XFS or JFS (I'm biased on this one). At least they are enterprise grade. Maybe for low CPU usage you should do got a non-journaling fs ? It is just a guess, and not based on anything other than gut feeling. And if you want something realtime-ish with Asterisk, you might want to go to some other hardware (not PC). I really can't recommend anything in particular since I don't know what kind of load you have. Best Regards, - -- Rodrigo Barbosa <rodrigob at suespammers.org> "Quid quid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur" "Be excellent to each other ..." - Bill & Ted (Wyld Stallyns) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEMH1HpdyWzQ5b5ckRAvgeAJ9aZ3R/fb3Ak6v4fB2787RT9ucjKACfVozW jrejTWZKDP+GO9PBhkNVRPc= =22CW -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----