[CentOS] wu-ftpd, proftpd, or vsftpd!

Sun Apr 30 23:23:24 UTC 2006
Johnny Hughes <mailing-lists at hughesjr.com>

On Sun, 2006-04-30 at 19:13 -0400, José Alburquerque wrote:
> albi wrote:
> >erhm, the vsftp-software stands for "very secure ftp", but of course the
> >admin and the admin's configuring makes it secure or not
> >
> >(the fact that the redhat-company now uses it as their default
> >ftp-server doesn't mean anything, because they were provided wu-ftpd as
> >the default ftp-server install years ago afair, and wu-ftpd has a pretty
> >bad reputation as has other software from WU, like pine)
> >
> May I ask what is wrong with pine?  TIA.
It's license 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20060430/05a9ffc2/attachment-0005.sig>