On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 12:06 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote: > Frank Tanner III wrote: > > On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 01:36 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote: > >> pctech at mybellybutton.com wrote: > >>> For those of you that either have an older revision of my firewall document, or are otherwise keeping track of it, there is a new version available. The current version of the document is version 3.1. It's changed rather significantly in some areas. > >> and who are you ? > >> and what / where is your firewall doc ? > >> > > > > I am a CentOS user just like yourself. Nothing more and nothing less. > > My document was initially created for my own use, but after I got it to > > a sufficiently "useful" state, I figured that others in the Linux > > community might like it as well. > > <-- snip loads of fluff --> > > you are still forgetting something... like. maybe a place to get this > doc ? if you dont have a place to host it - as Jim and Ralph have > already pointed out perhaps we could move it into the centos wiki ( > wiki.centos.org ). > > as for your attitude, its you who seems to have the problem - dont > expect people to just know you off the email address you use or directly > be able to make a connection with a doc that is neither available, nor > ever been mentioned on this list. Everyone here does not have the time > or the latitude to follow each and every msg also posted in the forums. > Actually, i might be surprised if more than a handfull of the thousands > subscribed here actually watch the forums and the lists. > > An email that says "ok, I've updated my doc" means absolutely nothing to > anyone, unless it also includes some relevant info, my questions to you > were to follow up for such info. > There goes YOUR attitude again. I *SPECIFICALLY* stated in my initial e-mail "or those of you that either have an older revision of my firewall document, or are otherwise keeping track of it, there is a new version available.". How about you climb down off of your high horse and actually READ the e-mail instead of jumping all over me. I realize that a rational conversation is beyond some people's capabilities, as it appears to be beyond yours, but if you don't have anything USEFUL to contribute, why contribute at all? > -- --------------------------------------------------- Frank Tanner III (pctech at mybellybutton.com) ICQ: 1730844 AIM: KalokSundancer MSN: pctech at mybellybutton.com YIM: fbtanner