On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 16:32 -0400, William Hooper wrote: > Philip Wyett wrote: > > On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 15:38 -0400, Alain Reguera wrote: > > > >> Hello, > >> > >> > >> I've been talking with some friends about the Redhat's SRPMs release > >> issue. I've been reading the trademarks and some points of GPL. But get > >> some confusion around the questions: > >> > >> Is redhat forced to release the sources of its product? > >> > > > > RedHat choose to use and release GPL code and a requirement of that is > > the making available of the source code. > > Two things: > > 1) Point me to the clause in the GPL that says you have to give the source > away to someone you didn't give binaries to. > Saying the "releasing GPL code" implied customers. Maybe I should have been a little more specific. > 2) There is a bunch of software in RHEL that isn't GPL. > I never brought non GPL into this. Regards Phil