Steven Vishoot wrote: [Mailtrimming?] > Ok. so if you click on your link you get something > totally different than what you were trying to send to > me since the link has the > in there, and the browser > adds %3 to the end of the link. now when i removed it > then it worked how you wanted me to see it. Dammit now > dont add that extra > in the link anymore... :-) this > is what it came out with when clicked on the link.... As "<" and ">" aren't allowed in links, I don't see what the problem is. RFC 1738: The characters "<" and ">" are unsafe because they are used as the delimiters around URLs in free text; Just being an RFC conformist. Ralph -- Ralph Angenendt......ra at br-online.de | .."Text processing has made it possible Bayerischer Rundfunk...80300 München | ....to right-justify any idea, even one Programmbereich.Bayern 3, Jugend und | .which cannot be justified on any other Multimedia.........Tl:089.5900.16023 | ..........grounds." -- J. Finnegan, USC -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20060821/4a247bbb/attachment-0005.sig>