-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 06:49:33PM -0400, Kurt Hansen wrote: > first last wrote: > >Unmanaged, no control panel, decent connection (it's going to run a > >webapp on it, not too graphic heavy but needs decent latency). > > > >Hardware wise, 512MB of RAM, 40GB of disk and a Celeron should be > >enough. > > > >Don't have any particular budget in mind, just as far as it is not > >excessive. > > Sounds a lot like our situation. > > Check out LiquidWeb, www.liquidweb.com. I've been very, very happy with > the service they have provided for the past two years. When I did a > search a couple of years back, they were one of only two providers for > which I could find NO negative comments. Lots of positives. And, they > were cheaper than the other one. http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?t=536798 []s - -- Rodrigo Barbosa "Quid quid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur" "Be excellent to each other ..." - Bill & Ted (Wyld Stallyns) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFE9ihQpdyWzQ5b5ckRAnNfAJ4+CEVVX//QzccHu+v5oiNA4rZxrgCgqtGJ oCqtuMmL6M7NPGWhJ76w0HE= =XQ7C -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----