There is no 'ahci' mode in the bios settings for the DG965ss. :-) Thanks, -Drew XLHost.com -----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of mike.redan at bell.ca Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 10:08 AM To: centos at centos.org Subject: RE: [CentOS] CentOS 4 and Intel D965 motherboards Hmm..I have not used that hardware myself..but from the release notes, it looks like it is supported (with a work around): From: http://mirror.centos.org/centos/4/docs/html/release-notes/as-x86/RELEASE -NOTES-U4-en.html <snip> Support for the Intel I/O Controller Hub (ICH8) southbridge chipset is now available. Note If your system uses the ICH8 SATA controller and the BIOS is set to IDE mode for the controller, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 Update 4 will not recognize the attached drives. To work around this issue, enable the ICH8 controller in AHCI mode from within the BIOS. Red Hat plans to fix this issue in future releases of Red Hat Enterprise Linux. For more information, please refer to Red Hat Knowledge Base at the following URL: http://kbase.redhat.com/faq/ </snip> -----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Drew Weaver Sent: December 6, 2006 10:12 AM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: RE: [CentOS] CentOS 4 and Intel D965 motherboards Would it be possible for CentOS to release an installer for 4.4 that uses a newer kernel, or maybe the same kernel patched to work with ICH8? It would be a great boon to a great many folks I'd imagine. At the very least ensure that CentOS 5 works with ICH8? -Drew -----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of John R Pierce Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 2:40 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 4 and Intel D965 motherboards > If it's not too late, return the motherboard, get something else. > > My personal experience with Intel's desktop motherboards is that they > work most of the time for most of the people. thats been the exact opposite of my experiences with Intel branded motherboards. They've been consistently well engineered, and well built, have very good aftermarket support (BIOS upgrades and drivers are still available for nearly every board they've ever made, and they are MUCH better documented than the typical taiwan stuff). Intel has had a few funky chipsets that NO motherboards could fix (anything that used RDRAM, and worse, the chipsets that used RD->SDRAM bridges like the i810), but otherwise I've found them very compatible. I do try and avoid the chipsets with onboard graphics. I've never seen ANY documentation like ftp://download.intel.com/design/motherbd/lt/D5601702US.pdf (for the DP965LT, a current mainstream performance board I'd strongly consider using for a Core 2 Duo desktop) from any taiwan board maker. Note they actually give power specifications for the board, thermal design guidelines, etc. Detailed errata in ftp://download.intel.com/design/motherbd/lt/D6333603US.pdf (ever seen errata on a taiwan board? muahaahahahaha, right!) RHEL/CentOS 4 is getting a bit long in the tooth, and support for the latest hardware is somewhat lagging, this can be an issue with any new system. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS at centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS at centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS at centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos