On Fri, 2006-12-29 at 10:37 -0500, fredex wrote: > On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 01:41:54PM +0000, Josh Donovan wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I use CentOS as a firewall/proxy/webserver/fileserver > > in my small network. As the small-spec machine with > > CentOS is heavily loaded/used I can't afford downtime. > > 20 GB, pentium II with only 128 MB RAM. > > > > However I want to know the news on 4.5 is it due soon? > > Can I gain more by running CentOS 3.x range on such an > > old machine like mine? > > > > Will CentOS 5.0 mean you need a minimum of 512 RAM? > > What is the latest on this? > > > > Are there any addons for CentOS such as > > squidguard/dansguardian etc? that can assist in > > parental controls? > > > > Not directly answering your question, but... > > You may wish to investigate one of the small standalone firewall > distributions such as Smoothwall, IPCop, or m0n0wall (bsd-based). > They will all easily run in 128mb, and are easy to configure. > They are all easy to install. > > M0n0wall looks intriguing, I may give it a try here someday,... it runs > from non-writable media such as a CD and saves config on a floppy. It > can be run from a hard drive or a flash memory card of some sort too. > The obvious advantage is that if someone cracks the machine they can't > do any damage (to it, directly) because it's not writable. > > And you really shouldn't be running web- or file-servers on your firewall, > the more stuff running on it the more opportunities you present for an > evil person/entity to crack it. > > I'd suggest using one of the above then put another machine in a DMZ > to do web server duty (if it is supposed to be externally visible-- > otherwise put it on another machine INSIDE the firewall on the "green" > (allegedly safe) network). > > I'm running Smoothwall Express 2.0 on my old K6-2/500 machine with > 128MB of memory and a 3 or 4 gig drive. It just runs and runs and runs > and doesn't come anywhere near using up all the memory. Before that > box became available I ran it on things similar to P90 or AMD K5, both > around 90-100 Mhz for several years with 64MB of ram and it ran just > fine on those machines too. > > Fred > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos