On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 10:55 -0500, Jim Perrin wrote: > > for the two packages. Since this is quite sometime after the > > announcement(?), is it reasonable to suspect another problem? Or, again, > > am I just being too quick on the draw? > > > > Feel free to ignore this if so. I'll retry getting that security update > > another time later in the week. > > Try running 'yum clean all' then 'yum update' and see what you get. > rpmforge should include all of dag's packages anyway so there > shouldn't be a problem. All I can tell you is it "WorksForMe". Forgot to say did all that and results are the same. Thanks -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20060214/39386550/attachment-0002.sig>