-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 04:47:20PM -0600, Steve Bergman wrote: > On Fri, 2006-02-03 at 19:06 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > OK I am going to say this once. > > I'm not sure what precipitated this statement. Most likely some issues that ended up on the centos-devel list. > But as a relatively new > user of CentOS, I have been impressed with the overall quality of this > list. The signal to noise ratio is high. You are obviously VERY new around here :) > And the responses are helpful. > > I'm also subscribed to fedora-list. And believe me... there is no > comparison. ;-) Wait and see, wait and see :) > Any list is going to have people that are more and less respectful of > the people who do the real work. Don't let it get you down. I have to agree that we do get lots of good, high quality answers. But the S/N ratio is far from high, unfortunately. On the other hand, it has improved lately. Best Regards, - -- Rodrigo Barbosa <rodrigob at suespammers.org> "Quid quid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur" "Be excellent to each other ..." - Bill & Ted (Wyld Stallyns) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFD5Tt7pdyWzQ5b5ckRAuVFAKCYxF5xW3F9IOymVAZTsZeLrSdyfACeKY1H utmCA4sP9uuTa+I5BjeBEH0= =ioug -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----