On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 22:34 +0000, Karanbir Singh wrote: > Ash Christopher wrote: > > > > wow...this book is copyrighted(2004) if that makes any difference. I > > sure don't like the idea of going backwards w/Apache, since, although I > > don't use php but w/standard xhtml/css it has shown me no problems at > > all and I just don't like to even think in terms of doing what they > > suggest. But I want to hear from y'all on this. Do y'all find that these > > problems between Apache 2.0 and PHP are really that prominent as they > > have stated? Or, maybe I am wishful thinking here but I am hoping that > > what are the problems they have stated ? it might be a good idea to also > as the php lists and the apache lists about these issues. > > > some will reply that they have no problems whatsoever using the 2 > > together...instead...just go to this website and there is a good > > tutorial on this subject. lol > > > > if you have any problems, file bugs. we'd rather handle them that way > karanbir, when I first posted on this, I quoted the book I was reading, the msg got 7 quick replies...everyone of them more or less stated that there seem to be no problems w/centos/apache/and php just the way it comes right now...the book was/is copyrighted in 2004 and there might have been issues then or the author is just set in his ways w/the older version of apache but after reading the replies, I feel very good about the current apache shipped w/centos 4.2 and php... I think this is a dun deal now thx all, John Rose