On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 06:42 -0500, ryan wrote: > On Sunday 05 February 2006 10:43 pm, Jim Perrin wrote: > > > The dramatic differences between the content on those links proves your > > > point well. > > > > I'm certain that the updated font brings the point out more > > clearly.... and there's a new comma. > > ... > > THOSE ARE MAJOR CHANGES!!!!!11111 > > > > /you win this round... :-P > > > > Hey, if we were Windows guys would be talking about NT 4 (10 yrs old) docs vs > Win2k (6 yrs old) docs. > > :-) I have to agree with Jim in principal though ... He is pointing to the documentation for CentOS-4 (for use on CentOS-4) and you are pointing to the Docs for RH-9. While in this case the pages are the same, they are quite different in other areas. We have full applicable docs here for everything we release :) http://www.centos.org/docs/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20060206/da9f1924/attachment-0005.sig>