On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 14:08 +0000, Will McDonald wrote: > On 08/02/06, Will McDonald <wmcdonald at gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm messing around with NFS v4 (any and all experience/horror stories > > about EL4's NFS v4 in production environments more than welcome as I'm > > still at the evaluation/test stage) and looking at the best way to > > setup the --bind mounts for the NFS v4 pseudofilesystem. > > Just found the answer to my own question... > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2003-October/msg00957.html > > "mount --bind" is the same as "mount -o bind" > > So I can just have bind as an option in haresources for that particular mount. I was just writing that :) > > I'd still be interested in hearing other's opinions on NFS v4 in > production environments. > I have read about, but haven't had any major NFS v4 issues. I don't do a lot of NFS though ... in fact, the only time I use NFS is if I am rebuilding a huge number of RPMS and using our round robin build script so I can get more than 1 server involved in the building. I did package and build all the DRBD / Heartbeat tools for CentOS and I have been using these tools in production with zero problems since about 3 months before they were released as extras. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20060208/f37e3be8/attachment-0005.sig>