On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 13:08 +0100, Peter Kjellström wrote: > On Wednesday 15 February 2006 12:49, William L. Maltby wrote: > > On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 04:36 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > > On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 08:02 -0300, Adriano Frare wrote: > > > > <snip bunch of diag log > > > > > > > > >>Error Downloading Packages: > > > > >> nmap - 2:4.01-1.2.el4.rf.i386: failure: > > > > >>RPMS/nmap-4.01-1.2.el4.rf.i386.rpm from rpmforge: [Errno 256] No more > > > > >>mirrors to try. > > > > >> nmap-frontend - 2:4.01-1.2.el4.rf.i386: failure: RPMS/nmap- > > > > >>frontend-4.01-1.2.el4.rf.i386.rpm from rpmforge: [Errno 256] No more > > > > >>mirrors to try. > > > > > > OK ... I think we may have 2 separate problems here. > > > > > > > > <snip> > > > BUT there is also a problem specifically with nmap ... it is a broken > > > package checksum in the yum metadata files. Last time Dag had this > > > problem it was a bug with the way the createrepo -c function worked. > > > > Do [I|we|you] need to do anything re notification to Dag? Do you feel > > the file is essentially OK and should I try to install by override the > > checking? Is that possible? > > that perticular file is most probably not good. don't try to force it in. > > /Peter OK. I'll follow that approach and wait. Thanks again, Bill -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20060215/4dc6f2ae/attachment-0005.sig>