[CentOS] freenx
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.com
Tue Jan 24 22:34:28 UTC 2006
On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 15:57, Maciej Żenczykowski wrote:
> I've read through the thread you provided and I'm not convinced. Indeed
> it still seems like a bad design decision to me. Why isn't the normal ssh
> authentication good enough for NX?
I think the idea was to have a minimally-privileged program that
can't do anything but provide a tunnel.
> And if there is some need for a
> different authentication than it should still - also support normal ssh by
> default for all the other cases - like mine - where it's not needed.
That's probably possible if you want to work at it. I don't see
why all the components of the server couldn't run as you if you
trust them not to delete your files - unless sessions for different
users share a cache of some sort.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.com
More information about the CentOS
mailing list