Linux HA may not be the best choice in your situation. [CentOS]High Availability using 2 sites
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.comFri Jan 6 05:09:19 UTC 2006
- Previous message: Linux HA may not be the best choice in your situation. [CentOS]High Availability using 2 sites
- Next message: Linux HA may not be the best choice in yoursituation. [CentOS]High Availability using 2 sites
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 22:41, Tim Edwards wrote: > Les Mikesell wrote: > > > > > > > No, it describes what happens when a large number of clients are > > behind the same local DNS server - and not very realistically > > at that. > > It describes what happens with a typical ISP where all the users are > looking up addresses using the ISP's caching nameservers, this is not a > local network. If it was a local network I was dealing with I could just > have all the clients resolve off the one DNS server and there'd be no > propagation delay. The problem with the Internet is the propagation > delay out to all those seperate ISP's caching nameservers. If all of your users connect through the same ISP, perhaps you should consider moving the server(s) to a data center provided by that ISP to reduce the chances they would be unreachable. However, even when everyone uses the same DNS cache a new lookup should happen every time the TTL expires so unless everyone connects at the same time you should still get random distribution. If the ISP's DNS server doesn't observe the DNS TTL (you can watch it count down with 'dig'), find a different ISP or hand-configure the clients to use servers that work. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com
- Previous message: Linux HA may not be the best choice in your situation. [CentOS]High Availability using 2 sites
- Next message: Linux HA may not be the best choice in yoursituation. [CentOS]High Availability using 2 sites
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list