[CentOS] Extending Network - OT -- PCs are poor wire-speed routers
Eduardo Grosclaude
eduardo.grosclaude at gmail.comFri Jan 6 16:03:23 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [CentOS] Extending Network - OT -- PCs are poor wire-speed routers
- Next message: [CentOS] *tangent* High Availability using 2 sites -- yep, "propogation."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> > 1) Unless 95% of the traffic stays local to the same subnet, I would > _not_ use a PC as a router. Having a slow WAN link bottleneck on the other side could also qualify? 2) If you don't need segmentation, then "supernet." _All_ systems can > keep the same IP addresses, just their subnet masks need to change. I think he needs to be told of the implications -- masks are not to be slipped off their proper left bounds. You can't shorten them beyond the class' network part and you can't (shouldn't) step on other people's networks. As IIRC we don't know if he has private addressing, this should be done under a network engineer surveillance. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20060106/48376152/attachment-0001.html>
- Previous message: [CentOS] Extending Network - OT -- PCs are poor wire-speed routers
- Next message: [CentOS] *tangent* High Availability using 2 sites -- yep, "propogation."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list