[CentOS] LVM
Peter Kjellström
cap at nsc.liu.seTue Jan 10 13:57:26 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [CentOS] LVM
- Next message: [CentOS] Yum out of sync?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
We use LVM directly (LVM whole disk, no partition tables) on top of 3ware hardware raid on about ten NFS servers (total 35 TiB). Filesystem size (and therefore LVM lv and vg sizes) are 0.4 - 3.6 TiB. All is well. We are currently using a non-centos kernel but LVM has behaved nicely on stock kernel too. /Peter K On Tuesday 10 January 2006 03:33, Peter Kitchener wrote: > How many people use LVM's in their production servers? Are they reliable > for use in these sorts of systems? I am asking this because i was > reading the LVM Howto about upgrading discs etc. > > Regards, > > Peter -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Peter Kjellström | National Supercomputer Centre | Sweden | http://www.nsc.liu.se -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20060110/e243915a/attachment-0001.sig>
- Previous message: [CentOS] LVM
- Next message: [CentOS] Yum out of sync?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list