[CentOS] Arguments to continue using it
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.comMon Jan 23 03:44:45 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [CentOS] Arguments to continue using it
- Next message: [CentOS] Arguments to continue using it
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sun, 2006-01-22 at 20:08, Alain Reguera wrote: > The arguments they gave to me were, what happen if redhat close the > base packages, they don't have to release them, but just to the buyer, > and we can't buy the distro, there are others distros like debian that > is totally free, and without dependencies of proprietary industry. > > Would some of you explain me this issue, or point me somewhere to > read?. I'll really appreciate that. Redhat has has been fanatical about observing the GPL on upstream packages, applying it to their own their own code and making source available in RPM form even for packages with licenses that don't require it. While it is always good practice to have a 'plan B' to cover the possibility of a preferred product becoming unavailable, there is no reason to expect things to change and not much point in switching to a different version ahead of time. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com
- Previous message: [CentOS] Arguments to continue using it
- Next message: [CentOS] Arguments to continue using it
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list