On Tue, 2006-01-03 at 11:27 -0800, Jeff Lasman wrote: > On Tuesday 03 January 2006 08:10 am, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > > Now how in the bleep did I have this in my old attempt (but Centos > > 3.4) and it worked? > > Has to do with the default directory structure for 3.x vs 4.x. > > My guess is that 3.x didn't have a chrooted BIND and that 4.x did. > > But it's only a guess based on recollection; I'm not looking at a system > now. > You can install bind in either a chroot or the regular way on C4. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20060103/925092dc/attachment-0005.sig>