On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 17:55, Jim Perrin wrote: > > XXX brand of YYY > > where YYY was a generic term then they could tell they had what > > they wanted either way. > > > As Johnny said, we've been asked not to use certain trademarked items, > and I don't really see any reason to go against that right now whether > or not we're "technically" correct in doing so. There are plenty of > other "open source" distributions like mandriva and suse, where > rebuilding the corporate or EL version is nearly impossible, if not > outright prohibited by the license agreement. RH supports the > community as much as anyone else, and we do use their source packages, > so if they say "we'd appreciate you not doing that" it's a reasonable > thing. Add 2-3 lines of text manually, or bite the hand that feeds > you. Not really a tough call for me. Of course, but it would be nice if 3rd party app packagers started asking how to detect the OS compatibility without referencing a brand name with the danger of letting it become generic. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com