-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 12:29:48PM -0800, Fong Vang wrote: > On 1/18/06, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 14:15, Fong Vang wrote: > > > > > Which kernel would you recommend? I guess we'll have to try the > > > kernel from CentOS 4.2. > > > > Did you have some reason to not do a full update to 4.2? > > > We have to stick with 4.1 until the next release because our process > requires it. A release starts with Engineering, then it goes into in > QA, and eventually hits Production. We can't simply switch to 4.2 > without going through the formal process (which can take a while), but > I can certainly try out the new kernel on one system and revert > afterward. I would recomend against that. Simply the the non-smp version of the kernel you are already running: kernel-2.6.9-11.EL.i686.rpm If you start changing too many things, or making too great a change, you will never be able to know what fixed the issue, let alone document it. - -- Rodrigo Barbosa <rodrigob at suespammers.org> "Quid quid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur" "Be excellent to each other ..." - Bill & Ted (Wyld Stallyns) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDzqrwpdyWzQ5b5ckRAufVAJ0b+QuhTg7AfqF9DgQlTCzqtTcsZACeLTwY iZyRXjBDXh5Actcgld2zaDM= =wtSB -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----