> But my changes will be minimal and can be easily documented/explained > to management. If it shows up with unsupported in the name, a lot of > people will be alarmed. I wish we could call it something else -- > perhaps "plus" or "extended" instead of "unsupported". What level of support do they think they're getting with CentOS? Technically it's ALL unsupported. If they want support, have them buy a rhel license (so that rhel support can laugh at you when you ask for xfs/reiserfs support). -- Jim Perrin System Architect - UIT Ft Gordon & US Army Signal Center