On 1/19/06, Jim Perrin <jperrin at gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm trying to add the xfs and reiserfs module (the centosplus kernel > > package has an unsupported which I don't want to use). I realized > > that it was you who packaged this unsupported kernel. How did you go > > about adding the module? The procedure I used to add these in CentOS > > 4.1 i686 doesn't seem to work. > > Keep in mind that the xfs modules in the default kernel you're > rebuilding.... well, they suck. This is why there's a custom xfs > kernel module in the dev.centos.org repository. The stock XFS module > will foul things up nicely for you, as there are all sorts of flaws in > it as well as things unsupported that are generally required for rhel > kernels (4k stacks anyone?). I would REALLY have to advise that you > use the unsupported kernel that is provided. The one you're building > seems to be causing you a fair amount of grief, and you haven't even > got it installed yet. I didn't know there's a dev.centos.org. There's quite a bit of stuff there. What exactly are these? kernel-module-xfs-2.6.9-11.EL-0.1-1.x86_64.rpm kernel-module-xfs-2.6.9-11.ELsmp-0.1-1.x86_64.rpm kernel-module-xfs-2.6.9-22.0.1.EL-0.1-1.x86_64.rpm kernel-module-xfs-2.6.9-22.0.1.ELsmp-0.1-1.x86_64.rpm kernel-module-xfs-2.6.9-22.EL-0.1-1.x86_64.rpm kernel-module-xfs-2.6.9-22.ELsmp-0.1-1.x86_64.rpm Do these contain just the xfs module? I've forgotten about the src rpm for the unsupported kernel. I'll try building with that instead after changing the name. > -- > Jim Perrin > System Architect - UIT > Ft Gordon & US Army Signal Center > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >