Les Mikesell wrote: > On Sun, 2006-01-22 at 22:09, Paul wrote: >> I also found Debian Stable a bit too long in the tooth as far as >> software packages ... it felt like I was migrating from RHL 7.3 to 6.2. > > Yes, if you are arguing about future availability of Centos, ask > the Debian proponent to describe the schedule for planned > future Debian releases. I've never been able to understand > that myself. And for EOL on security fixes for older versions. I have to admit that I have no idea how long they support these, so their support actually could be quite okay. Ralph -- Ralph Angenendt......ra at br-online.de | .."Text processing has made it possible Bayerischer Rundfunk...80300 München | ....to right-justify any idea, even one Programmbereich.Bayern 3, Jugend und | .which cannot be justified on any other Multimedia.........Tl:089.5900.16023 | ..........grounds." -- J. Finnegan, USC -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20060123/eac64bed/attachment-0005.sig>