Lamar Owen wrote: >> > KDE 3.5 is slower, unfortunately, so you don't want to do this on an >> > old machine; the machine needs to be recent and needs to have more than >> > 256MB ... >> Provided ample RAM, I've personally found kde 3.5 to be subjectively >> faster (partly due to pkg optimization tweaking). > > Kmail for one definitely feels slower, and the startup time IS longer. ... > it felt slower. Started Kontact/kmail, and it too felt slower, although OK, I'll give you that kmail is slower. However, I still have to say that KDE(3.5), in general, is (should be) faster. -- Rex