On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 18:16 -0500, Jim Perrin wrote: > > Hmmm. I'll give that a try. Not really interested in the error about being > > 'self-signed' (issuing authority) but just want the name to be right and the > > security to be there. > > > > Will try and let you know. > > http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/vhosts/name-based.html > > Note the line near the top that says "Name-based virtual hosting > cannot be used with SSL secure servers because of the nature of the > SSL protocol." And also > http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/ssl/ssl_faq.html#vhosts > > The first just says you can't. the second provides a more detailed > reason. The way I gave you is really the only way to accomplish what > you're doing with mod_ssl etc. > I spent much time around trying to figure out a way to do this ... only way I found ... do it by IP ... each SSL cert needs to be on a different IP -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20060123/907b0235/attachment-0005.sig>