Jim Perrin wrote: > Any reason you're using tinydns as opposed to bind? I can throw a > couple sample zones your way for bind, but I've never looked at > tinydns (given that it doesn't come with centos and all :-P ) > Yes I now.... but centos can run this also :) No specific reason, other than I've been told that it's lighter than bind and more secure, but I wouldn't now. Also I have reasonable good documentation on how to get it up running. only trying it out. The sample zones for bind would be very much appreciated. kai