[CentOS] Lame update from Dag's repo fails for me, any help?

Mon Jan 30 17:47:13 UTC 2006
William L. Maltby <BillsCentOS at triad.rr.com>

On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 12:31 -0500, Jim Perrin wrote:
> > Apologies, Have not been aware that anything was off topic here whne it
> > came to CentOS, yum, etc. Will try to do better in the future.
> >
> 
> It's not that it's off topic, it's more along the lines of "we can't
> help if there is indeed a problem with that repo". This is why I
> suggest dag or the rpmforge list. It's their repo, so if there's a bad
> sig etc, they'll be able to fix it. If it's a case of "you forgot to
> install the gpg key" they'll point that out as well.

Ok. I had installed his key using both methods. Tried again just in case
I fubarred it. Nope, I didn't. Same results. Will pursue with that site.

Thx for the responses.

Bill
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20060130/e950e8b5/attachment-0005.sig>