[CentOS] LVM Input/output error
William L. Maltby
BillsCentOS at triad.rr.comMon Jul 10 15:13:42 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [CentOS] LVM Input/output error
- Next message: [CentOS] LVM Input/output error
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, 2006-07-10 at 17:09 +0300, itayf at nospammail.net wrote: > > > [root at frodo ~]# sfdisk -l /dev/sdc > > > > > ><snip> > Had to wait until I came back to work and could reboot the > machine. Using William's instructions, modulus using 8e as Matt > Hyclak pointed out, seems to solve the problem. Everything seems > to work fine: lvcreation, writing files, etc. > > The only odd thing is in regard to the output of sfdisk. Note > the warning when 'sfdisk -l' is invoked without a device > argument. According to the man page this is a legitimate call > that should produce output similar in nature to 'fdisk -l' (which > works as expected). > > <man> > The second type of invocation: sfdisk -l [options] device will list > the partitions on this device. If the device argument is omitted, the > partitions on all hard disks are listed. > % sfdisk -l /dev/hdc > </man> > > I am quite sure that this is an 'sfdisk' issue unrelated to the > problem I needed to solve. But I would like to be careful before > I declare [RESOLVED]. My workstation, in use for over a year now, shows the same warning message (start=63...) as your transcript. Further, having used sfdisk for a *long* time for some fairly rigorous applications, I have complete confidence in it. Reread the man sections on the "+" and "-" suffix and you get your first clue. The run sfdisk again and add "-uS" and I think you will be OK with it. It will also give warning messages if the true geometry of a drive appears to be other than what is shown in the disk label (often called MBR). Although I have faith in the software, the doc (as is normal?) is not so trustworthy. You'll see only 1 HD in my transcript at the end of this reply, but look at this. [root at wlmlfs08 ~]# sfdisk -l -uS /dev/hdd Disk /dev/hdd: 7297 cylinders, 255 heads, 63 sectors/track Units = sectors of 512 bytes, counting from 0 Device Boot Start End #sectors Id System /dev/hdd1 * 63 208844 208782 83 Linux /dev/hdd2 208845 117226304 117017460 8e Linux LVM /dev/hdd3 0 - 0 0 Empty /dev/hdd4 0 - 0 0 Empty There is a conflict in the man page: the prototype shows device is not optional if options are provided but the paragraph you high-lighted says it has a behavior that makes it optional. On my machine, the missing device specification does not produce the documented behavior. I conclude that if options are given, device is not optional *unless* you accept undefined behavior as acceptable! =>:-O > > Perhaps I will try sfdisk with a different machine to see if > there is a difference. I don't think you'll see any difference if the config is similar. I've attached my transcript below. > > Thanks, > Itay > <snip> ============================================================= [root at wlmlfs08 ~]# sfdisk -l Disk /dev/hda: 12161 cylinders, 255 heads, 63 sectors/track Units = cylinders of 8225280 bytes, blocks of 1024 bytes, counting from 0 Device Boot Start End #cyls #blocks Id System /dev/hda1 * 0+ 12 13- 104391 83 Linux /dev/hda2 13 2445 2433 19543072+ 8e Linux LVM /dev/hda3 2446 4876 2431 19527007+ 8e Linux LVM /dev/hda4 0 - 0 0 0 Empty Warning: start=63 - this looks like a partition rather than the entire disk. Using fdisk on it is probably meaningless. [Use the --force option if you really want this] [root at wlmlfs08 ~]# sfdisk -l -uS Disk /dev/hda: 12161 cylinders, 255 heads, 63 sectors/track Units = sectors of 512 bytes, counting from 0 Device Boot Start End #sectors Id System /dev/hda1 * 63 208844 208782 83 Linux /dev/hda2 208845 39294989 39086145 8e Linux LVM /dev/hda3 39294990 78349004 39054015 8e Linux LVM /dev/hda4 0 - 0 0 Empty Warning: start=63 - this looks like a partition rather than the entire disk. Using fdisk on it is probably meaningless. [Use the --force option if you really want this] [root at wlmlfs08 ~]# ============================================================================ -- Bill -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20060710/5ce5a09d/attachment-0001.sig>
- Previous message: [CentOS] LVM Input/output error
- Next message: [CentOS] LVM Input/output error
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list