Jim Perrin wrote: >> Is that a provisional issue? >> >> I mean, IMHO there's no point in maintaining this two releases of the >> same >> thing/pkg in different repositories, unless you name them different to be >> seleccted as appropiate (not exclude tag involved). > > > These aren't centos repositories. We don't maintain them and they do > not come from the .centos.org domain. Dag does the rpmforge.net > repository and is receptive to input from the community as to what > packages they'd like to see. Karanbir maintains his own project which > is a rebuild of fedora extras for Centos. The more repositories you > add, the more duplication you're likely to run into. This is why what > Johnny suggested above is a good idea. Sure, i start thinking it's the best option in the actual environment. > >> If so, how many pkgs are going to be like this way? It seems to me it >> could be a >> nightmare, but this is only my opinion. Hints allowed. > > > A few. > yum --disablerepo \* --enablerepo rpmforge list available > dag > yum --disablerepo \* --enablerepo kbs-extras list available > kbs > > then have a look through and compare the two. > > I take note, Thx Jim & John