On Sun, 2006-07-02 at 15:55 +0200, Maciej Żenczykowski wrote: > ><snip> > Next, keep a database (maybe just a text file) from which repo (or > repogroup) each package was installed, and consider only packages from the > same repogroup to be valid upgrade paths. And refuse to install stuff > that would require a cross-repogroup upgrade (or make a big fat warning > dialog y/n default no box). Regardless of any other restrictions/enablements, the "data base" is key. If a data base can tell from whence the original package (OP? ;-) came, it can be used to ensure that updates/upgrades only come from there... unless we really examine the need and we then see that the use should be able to a) override, b) permanently change, ... Regardless, A DB will set us free. > > Comments? > MaZe > <snip sig> -- Bill -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20060703/ccec6a09/attachment-0005.sig>