On Fri, 2006-07-21 at 10:52 -0500, Larry Vaden wrote: > On 7/21/06, William L. Maltby <BillsCentOS at triad.rr.com> wrote: > > On Fri, 2006-07-21 at 10:05 -0500, Larry Vaden wrote: > > > <snip> > > To answer your question: because it is there! ;-) And it can! > > > > Seriously, a recent thread involving this is in the archives. Short ans: > > "swappiness" parameter can be used to reduce it and there is a "bug" > > that disappears with U4 (IIRC). Also, some config settings can reduce > > it. > > > > Now we have two threads on it. >:-) > > <humor> > So, how many threads before it can go in the faq? > </humor> Got me! I'm just a TDU (Typical Dumb User)! > > Seriously, did I miss it or is Centos at centos.org not covered by Google groups? I recall someone posted a way *other* than what I do to find it, but I can't remember it (and never wanted to become a Google expert either). *BUT* what I use is the "site:centos" as a parameter (for me, usually in advanced search, but I guess it works normally too). Someday I'll need to look that up. But I'm afraid of the number of hits I'll get, even within the list, on "Google"! =>:-O > > If not covered by Google groups, why (or more positively, can we change that)? IUC, that would be the ref I mentioned that I can't remember? *sigh* They say your memory's the 2nd thing to go! > > rgds/ldv > <snip sig stuff> HTH -- Bill -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20060721/88c0a7fc/attachment-0005.sig>