On 7/24/06, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, 2006-07-24 at 12:45 -0300, Eduardo Grosclaude wrote: > > > > > Thank you for your point, on which I wholly agree, but I was > > taking "stability" as "a measure of velocity in change" of a > > system's components-- here reflected in a shorter or longer > > life cycle for each version. > > Seems like a bad concept - if something is broken in the initial release > you really do want the change that fixes it... You surely want them, but I can't see why it's a bad concept-- "Distro X has published Y weekly MB of updates on average over the last year" is just a fact. -- Eduardo Grosclaude Universidad Nacional del Comahue Neuquen, Argentina -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20060724/15541728/attachment-0005.html>