Rodrigo Barbosa wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 06:36:05PM +0200, Alexander Dalloz wrote: > >> Rodrigo Barbosa schrieb: >> >> >>> I think most people here use BIND as their DNS server of choise. >>> >>> I just happen to have updated DLZ patch for the current bind version. >>> >>> DLZ patch allows you to use mysql (pgsql, ldap etc) as a backend for >>> zone storage. I make no garantees, of course, but if anyone is interested >>> on the patch (with or without the specfile for rpm building), please >>> let me know. >>> >>> To read more about DLZ: http://bind-dlz.sourceforge.net/ >>> >>> Best Regards, >>> >> Hi Rodrigo, >> >> mind you asking whether one should use your bind-dlz patch and not bind >> sdb? PNAELV includes SDB within the bind package on current Fedora Core >> and newer. Maybe you can point me to a paper? >> > > I actually never heard of sdb. > I'm not even able to find an specific URL for the project, even tho > I've found some pages for specific drivers: > http://www.venaas.no/ldap/bind-sdb/ > http://sourceforge.net/projects/mysql-bind/ > > I'll go and take a look at it, so I can compare. > > bind-dlz is far from complete. It only allow queries (no dynamic > updating for you, unless you go directly to the database), the > database is pretty confusing (but it can be easly improved), > and you can't have bind configuration itself on the database. > > Maybe sdb will be better. I'll have to check it out. It would seem that the SAMBA 4.0 project that is adding Active Directory, will have quite a bit of tying DNS and SQL. Been a while since I looked in that direction. I only want a SAMBA NT domain controller.....