Dag Wieers wrote: > On Mon, 31 Jul 2006, David Hrbá? wrote: > >> David Hrbá? napsal(a): >> >>> Well Dag has finally updated the package on 27th. So my advice is really >>> depreciated. :o) >>> >> Hmmm, I guess, I must say rpm --nodeps is not depreciated, Dag has >> updated the package, but it's not OK. Dag please update your .spec to >> include tinyca2.desktop from upstream >> http://tinyca.dyndns.org/cvs-bin/viewcvs.cgi/tinyca2.desktop?cvsroot=TinyCA2 >> Your desktop file is only English and not even working, links to tinyca... >> > > If you're talking to me, please then include me in the conversation. It's > a coincidence I read this mail. Being subscribed does not mean I read > every single mail. > Those that do are rather amazing. > You're implying that I was already notified of the problem, which I was > not. I just updated the package when a new release was made. > And thank you! > My desktop file is there because tinyca did not include a desktop file > when it was added. That's why it is English only (I do not provide > translation services). If it linked to tinyca instead, people did not > notify me. That's right I do not use tinyca myself (I have used it though) > Know of any other CA out there to try? > so problems inside a package may go unnoticed if nobody informs me. > > PS I noticed that a lot of RPMforge users are using this mailinglist to > report problems about RPMforge RPM packages. Please send them to the > proper RPMforge mailinglist. (users at lists.rpmforge.net or > suggest at lists.rpmforge.net Not another list to follow! :-P